Nash v. Hiller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
A. J. Nash, plaintiff in error, brought an action against the defendants in error for damages resulting from an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants and judgment was rendered accordingly. A. J. Nash, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, perfected an appeal from the order overruling his motion for a new trial. Defendants in error will be referred to as defendants or by name.
The material factual allegations contained in plaintiff’s petition are; that he was driving his automobile in a southerly direction on a certain highway when he observed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maben v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Houston v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Yoast v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Caudill v. CaudillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Foltz v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
3Cited by10 opinions
- Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Jones, Givens, Gotcher & Bogan, P.C. v. BergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- McKee v. NeilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Hair v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.