Ruby v. Warrior
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtTisinger, J.
Defendant in error, as plaintiff, began this action against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover the statutory penalty for usury alleged to have been collected from him by the defendant on promissory notes. The amended petition alleges in substance that the plaintiff executed to the defendant his promissory note for $1,000, dated July 19, 1911, due seven years after date, and 14 interest coupon notes for $30 each, maturing semiannually, commencing with the following January, and 14 additional interest notes for $20 each, maturing semiannually, all of which were secured by real…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Dugan v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Blasdel v. GowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Garland v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Watashe v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Ross v. BreeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Green v. ComerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Tobin v. HolmboeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.