Legal Opinion

James v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1917No. 5940PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, Ottawa County ; G. A. Brown, Assigned Judge. Action by S. H. Maxwell against George L. Coleman and others. Report of referee set aside, and new trial granted, from which action plaintiff brings error. Upon death of plaintiff in error, action revived in name of R. O. James, administrator.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

The plaintiff in error has printed in his brief a lengthy statement of the trial judge, delivered orally at the time of passing upon the motion for new tri&l, together with the report of the referee and the petition in error, and this is all of the record which he has included in his abstract. There is a brief recital in narrative form of the history of the case, which merely sets out the various steps taken in the settlement of the issues and the order referring the case to a referee. The exceptions to the referee’s report and the motion for new trial are omitted. There were 2,257 pages of…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hewitt v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Tribal Development Co. v. White Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API