Legal Opinion

Gates v. Settlers' Milling, Canal & Reservoir Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 4, 1907PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from the District Court of Woodward County; before John L. Pancoast, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

This action involves the question of priority of right to divert water from the Cimarron river for irrigation purposes. Oklahoma has not so far been credited to the arid belt, and agriculture has been successfully conducted by the aid of nature's supply of moisture; but in some localities, in the higher altitudes pertaining to the extreme western counties of the territory, irrigation upon a small scale lias been profitably resorted to, and an increasing public interest is being developed in not only the expediency, but the necessity, for extensive…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bake v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Senior v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Fort Morgan Land & Canal Co. v. South Platte Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  5. Conner v. Town of MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Watashe v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Murphy v. KerrDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1923
  4. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API