United States v. White
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
At trial the appellant moved to suppress a urinalysis report that was positive for the presence of benzoylecognine, a metabolite of cocaine, maintaining that her agreement to give a urine sample was not voluntary, but acquiescence to the color of authority displayed by her squadron section commander. See Mil.R.Evid. 314(e). After the *924trial judge refused to suppress the test resulte together with a derivative confession, a conditional guilty plea was entered to a single allegation of drug abuse. See R.C.M. 910(a)(2); United States v. Forbes, 19 M.J. 953…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RushingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. ForbesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. WallaceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. PellmanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. SpannU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. PeoplesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. SimmonsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988