Legal Opinion

United States v. Rushing

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 1, 1967No. 20,194PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*300Opinion

Quinn, Chief Judge:

This appeal raises important questions relating to the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search.

The first question deals with consent to a warrantless search. It is well settled that a person may voluntarily waive the protection of the Fourth Amendment and authorize a policeman to search his home or his personal effects without a warrant. United States v Wilcher, 4 USCMA 215, 15 CMR 215. Annotation: Validity of consent to search given by one in custody of officers, 9 ALR3d 858 (1966). In United States v Insani, 10 USCMA 519, 28 CMR 85, we held that a police…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. CollierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. RoaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. SikorskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. MewbornUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  5. United States v. HolcombUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API