United States v. Spann
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
This is an appeal from a bench trial conviction of a single allegation of drug abuse. *510Appellate defense counsel assign three errors which will be discussed seriatim. However, upon finding no error we affirm.
I
On 17 December 1985, the appellant provided his first sergeant a urine specimen in which the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis confirmed the presence of cocaine metabolites. At trial, defense counsel moved to suppress the test results arguing that the appellant’s consent to the seizure of his urine was not voluntary. See Mil.R.Evid. 314 and 316.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. BertelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. FordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. StoeckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. StroudU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. PellmanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. WhiteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987