Legal Opinion

United States v. Forbes

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 20, 1985No. ACM 24601PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge: '

After a motion to suppress his confession was denied, the appellant entered a conditional guilty plea to a single specification of drug abuse. R.C.M. 910(a)(2) permits such a procedure and states in part:(2) Conditional Pleas. With the approval of the military judge and the consent of the Government, an accused may enter a conditional plea of guilty, reserving in writing the right, on further review or appeal, to review of the adverse determination of any specified pretrial motion____ [emphasis added]

This provision is based on Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) and does not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CarmichaelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. DennisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. GarciaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. HansenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. DudleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. McLarenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. BarrorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API