Legal Opinion

United States v. Peoples

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 11, 1989No. ACM 27364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MURDOCK, Judge:

The appellant was convicted of one specification of use of cocaine and one specification of dishonorably failing to maintain sufficient funds in his checking account. He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, 10 months confinement, and reduction to airman basic. Now he asserts that the military judge improperly applied the inevitable discovery rule when he refused to suppress evidence of the appellant’s urinalysis. We agree it was error to admit the results of the urinalysis, but for a different reason.

The appellant reported late to work one morning, and his demeanor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. KozakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. HayeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. WhiteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. McClainU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. McLendonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API