Legal Opinion

Schwieterman v. Mercury Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1991No. G009382PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.

Dennis K. Schwieterman appeals a summary judgment entered against him in favor of Mercury Casualty Company. The court determined Schwieterman could not recover under his poli*1046cy’s underinsured motorist benefits because the limits on his “uninsured motorist benefits were the same as [the tortfeasor’s] liability limits.” We affirm.1

I

After Schwieterman and several other individuals were injured in an automobile accident, they settled with the tortfeasor’s insurance provider for the $30,000 policy limit of a “15/30 automobile liability policy.”2 Schwieterman,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Elwood v. Aid Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MessingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Fagundes v. American International Adjustment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Royal Insurance v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Lopez v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Schwieterman v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API