Schwieterman v. Mercury Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.
Dennis K. Schwieterman appeals a summary judgment entered against him in favor of Mercury Casualty Company. The court determined Schwieterman could not recover under his poli*1046cy’s underinsured motorist benefits because the limits on his “uninsured motorist benefits were the same as [the tortfeasor’s] liability limits.” We affirm.1
I
After Schwieterman and several other individuals were injured in an automobile accident, they settled with the tortfeasor’s insurance provider for the $30,000 policy limit of a “15/30 automobile liability policy.”2 Schwieterman,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Elwood v. Aid Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MessingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Fagundes v. American International Adjustment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Royal Insurance v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Lopez v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Schwieterman v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991