Legal Opinion

Fagundes v. American International Adjustment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1992No. D013385PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, J.

Manuel Fagundes (Fagundes) appeals from a grant of summary judgment against him and in favor of New Hampshire Insurance Company (New Hampshire) and American International Adjustment Company (AIAC). Fagundes argues that the insurance coverage he purchased was illusory, and triable issues of fact exist with respect to the extent of that coverage. As there was no material issue of fact, and as New Hampshire and AIAC were correctly determined to be under no legal obligation to Fagundes, we affirm.

Background

In 1986 Fagundes applied for minimum-coverage automobile insurance under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Glazewski v. Coronet Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Teachers' Retirement Board v. GenestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Crutcher v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Friesz Ex Rel. Friesz v. Farm & City Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API