Legal Opinion

Royal Insurance v. Cole

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 1993No. F016134PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

Introduction

Appellant Aaron Cole was a passenger in an automobile driven by Troy Franks, son of Charles and Barbara Franks, Royal Insurance Company’s (Royal) insured. Royal interpled the $100,000 limits of the Franks liability policy because of the extent of injuries suffered by Cole and others. Cole filed a cross-complaint for declaratory relief against Royal seeking damages under the underinsurance provisions of the Franks policy. After a trial on Cole’s cross-complaint, the trial court entered judgment for Royal.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Troy Franks was involved in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MessingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Schwieterman v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. PietakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. MorrisKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lopez v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. MorrisKentucky Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API