Royal Insurance v. Cole
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARRIS, J.
Introduction
Appellant Aaron Cole was a passenger in an automobile driven by Troy Franks, son of Charles and Barbara Franks, Royal Insurance Company’s (Royal) insured. Royal interpled the $100,000 limits of the Franks liability policy because of the extent of injuries suffered by Cole and others. Cole filed a cross-complaint for declaratory relief against Royal seeking damages under the underinsurance provisions of the Franks policy. After a trial on Cole’s cross-complaint, the trial court entered judgment for Royal.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Troy Franks was involved in a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MessingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Schwieterman v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. PietakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. MorrisKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Lopez v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. MorrisKentucky Supreme Court · 1999