Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Messinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1991No. C008817PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.—

Introduction

In this insurance coverage dispute, George and Diana Messinger (the Messingers) appeal from a summary judgment in favor of State Farm. This dispute arose out of a two-car collision after the Messingers sought to recover under their automobile underinsurance policy with State Farm payment of damages not covered by the tortfeasor’s liability policy. The Messingers alleged that the tortfeasor was underinsured as defined in their insurance policy and that they were each entitled to the full coverage under the policy minus the amounts already paid by the tortfeasor.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ramirez v. USAA Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Matarese v. New Hampshire Municipal Ass'n Property-Liability Insurance Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Galanty v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API