Legal Opinion

Schwieterman v. Mercury Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1991No. G009382Published

1Opinion of the Court

229 Cal.App.3d 1044 (1991)

280 Cal. Rptr. 804

DENNIS K. SCHWIETERMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. G009382.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

April 30, 1991.

COUNSEL

Prendiville & Passante, Andrew J. Prendiville and Ira M. Pesserilo for Plaintiff and Appellant.

O'Connor & Schmeltzer and Lee P. O'Connor for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SONENSHINE, Acting P.J.

Dennis K. Schwieterman appeals a summary judgment entered against him in favor of Mercury Casualty Company. The court determined Schwieterman could not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Kirkley v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API