Legal Opinion

Lorette v. Peter-Sam Investment Properties

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 19, 1995No. 93-833PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiff, Mark Lorette, sued the defendants, Peter-Sam Investment Properties and its individual partners, for damages arising from injuries he sustained while he was riding a dirt bike on the defendants’ property. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that RSA 215-A:34, II (1989) barred the plaintiff’s suit. The Superior Court (Groff, J.) granted the defendants’ motion. We affirm in part and remand.

The plaintiff alleged that on May 19,1991, he and Danny Bergeron were riding dirt bikes along the sand dunes on the defendants’ property when they accidentally drove off a twenty…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Thompson v. ForestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. City of Dover v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. State v. KilgusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. State v. KaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Del Norte, Inc. v. ProvencherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Nutbrown v. Mount Cranmore, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. New Hampshire Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Pitco Frialator, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Cecere v. Loon Mountain Recreation Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. In Re Concord Teachers (Nh Ret. System)Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API