Legal Opinion
State v. Kilgus
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 30, 1984No. 83-443PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.
The defendant, George W. Kilgus, Jr., appeals his conviction of witness tampering. The issues raised are the proper interpretation, and the constitutionality, of the witness tampering statute. RSA 641:5,1(a). We affirm.
The defendant was indicted on February 5, 1982, by a Hillsborough County Grand Jury on a charge of tampering with witnesses and informants. RSA 641:5, 1(a). After the defendant’s two motions to dismiss the indictment were denied, the first trial commenced in Superior Court (Souter, J.) on December -8, 1982. That trial was terminated before a verdict was reached, when the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. LaliberteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. KilgusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Waters v. HedbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Lorette v. Peter-Sam Investment PropertiesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Appeal of CNA Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.