Legal Opinion
Carson v. Maurer
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 31, 1980No. 80-017. Nos. 80-099, 80-136 and 80-191. No. 80-252. No. 80-273. No. 80-291PublishedCited by 290 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs in these consolidated appeals challenge the constitutionality of RSA ch. 507-C (Supp. 1979), governing actions for medical injury.
The plaintiffs here are also plaintiffs in underlying actions for medical injury; the defendants are medical care providers. In three of the actions below (Nos. 80-017, 80-099 and 80-136) the court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to comply with the notice requirement of RSA 507-C:5 (Supp. 1979), and the plaintiffs appealed. The plaintiffs in 80-136 then moved to amend their complaint to reflect compliance with RSA 507-C:5…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by290 opinions
- Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Lucas v. United StatesTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
285 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.