Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Forest

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 14, 1992No. 90-320PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

This case comes to us on an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 8, of the Superior Court’s (McHugh, J.) denial of the defendants’ motion to dismiss those portions of the plaintiffs’ tort action that alleged “willful, wanton and reckless” conduct on the part of the defendant co-employees. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and dismiss the surviving counts.

On August 26, 1986, a patient was admitted to the Franklin Regional Hospital following a diagnosis of acute and chronic alcoholism. During the course of his hospitalization, the patient became agitated and delusional.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Bilodeau v. Oliver Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. Vittum v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Park v. Rockwell International Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. Estabrook v. American Hoist & Derrick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Snierson v. ScrutonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  3. Wenners v. Great State Beverages, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. James Censullo v. Brenka Video, Inc., James Censullo v. Brenka Video, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Hickingbotham v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API