Legal Opinion
In Re Concord Teachers (Nh Ret. System)
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 8, 2009No. 2008-325PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
In this petition for a writ of certiorari, the petitioners, nineteen retired Concord teachers, seek review of the determination by the Board of Trustees (board) of the respondent, the New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS), that early retirement benefits received in their final twelve months of employment were not exempt from the 150 percent cap on “[e]arnable compensation,” RSA 100-A: 1, XVII (Supp. 2008), because there was insufficient evidence that they were “based on,” Laws 1991, 313:7, unused, pre-1991 sick time. We affirm.
Before discussing the relevant facts, we summarize the relevant…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re KalarSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Tuttle v. New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- In re PoulicakosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Tuttle v. MED. MAL. JOINT UNDERWRITINGSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.