Legal Opinion
State v. Kay
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 31, 1975No. 6820PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole question transferred by Middleton, Sp. J., without ruling is whether the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should be granted. The complaint was brought under RSA 358-A:2 (Supp. 1975) (Laws 1970, 19:1), the statute then in force. It is entitled “Regulation of Business Practices for Consumer Protection”. The material portions of this section read as follows:
“I. It shall be unlawful for any person to use any unfair method of competition or any unfair or deceptive act or practice in the conduct of any trade or commerce within this state. Such unfair method of competition or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doe v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- State v. WoodmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- State v. WebsterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- State v. ZetterbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Russell C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Atwood v. OwensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Nault's Automobile Sales, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Asmussen v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Appeal of Ashland Electric DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.