Legal Opinion

Del Norte, Inc. v. Provencher

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1997No. 95-717PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The plaintiff, Del Norte, Inc. (Del Norte), appeals an order of the Superior Court (Dalianis, J.) holding that the plaintiff’s predecessor in interest, Mundaca Investment Corporation (Mundaca), was barred by the statute of limitations from bringing an action, against the defendant, Arthur J. Provencher, on a promissory note. We reverse and remand.

In ruling on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court accepted the following facts. On or about April 12, 1990, the defendant executed a $15,000 demand promissory note (the note), secured by a mortgage on real property, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jenot v. White Mountain Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Benoit v. Test Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Thibeault v. CampbellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Lorette v. Peter-Sam Investment PropertiesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Big League Entertainment, Inc. v. Brox Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. Sintros v. HamonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. Estate of Joshua T. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Pierson v. HubbardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Iannelli v. Burger King Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API