Legal Opinion

Wade v. Markwell & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1953No. Civ. 19341PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an appeal by defendant company from a judgment for defendant’s conversion of plaintiff’s coat.

At the outset of the trial, defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that plaintiff’s first amended complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for the recovery of her coat or its value. After briefly taking testimony, plaintiff served on defendant her second amended complaint, and it was on the allegations of this pleading that the case was subsequently tried. There can be no quarrel with this procedure. A court may exercise great…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Baldwin v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Laks v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. & Affiliates v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API