Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1997No. Docket Nos. A074435, A074430PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALKER, J.

In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs and appellants 1 appeal from adverse judgments in their action for damages based on alleged fraud, conspiracy and willful misconduct in the design, construction, inspection and repair of the concrete foundations underlying their homes in Foster City, and for rescission of settlement agreements and releases made in connection with their initial claims for repair of those foundations. The trial court granted motions in limine by respondents Centex Real Estate Corporation (Centex) and Donald H. Hillebrandt (Hillebrandt) pursuant to the…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  4. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. K.C. Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API