Garcia v. Color Tile Distributing Company
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Chief Justice.
• The defendant in the trial court has appealed from a judgment rendered against it by the district .court sitting .without a jury. With one exception hereinafter discussed, the appeal relates entirely.to an atr tack on certain of the court’s findings and the contention that the court failed to adopt requested findings to the contrary. For the reasons hereafter stated, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Plaintiffs (husband and wife) contracted with the defendant to have laid some Armstrong’s Hydrocord Linoleum in a portion of the plaintiffs’ house. Prior to the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Reed v. StyronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Hardt v. BrinkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1961
- Ballance v. DunningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Jackson v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Mascarenas v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
- H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.