Legal Opinion
Mascarenas v. Jaramillo
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1991No. 18867PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
Defendant Jaramillo (Jaramillo) appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff Mascarenas (Mascarenas) $9,124.93 in compensatory damages on claims of breach of contract, breach of implied warranty and negligence. Jaramillo raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred by finding that Jaramillo was not an employee of Mascarenas; (2) whether the trial court erred by ruling that Jaramillo breached an implied warranty; and (3) whether ordering an unlicensed contractor to refund payments already received and to pay the cost of correcting his work…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Shaeffer v. KeltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Mantz v. FollingstadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Miller v. New Mexico Department of TransportationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Bourgeous v. Horizon Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.