Legal Opinion

Ballance v. Dunnington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1928No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for alleged malpractice by a physician in the use of the X-ray. Plaintiff stepped on a needle and it broke off in his foot. Defendant treated him, and, plaintiff claims, so burned his foot in a negligent use of X-ray as to cause him great pain and suffering and the ultimate loss of his right foot, by necessary am putation, about eight inches above the ankle. A jury awarded plaintiff $15,000 damages. Defendant reviews by writ of error.

At the close of plaintiff’s proofs defendant moved for a verdict in his favor. The court denied the motion. The motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. VanderhoofMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. O'Flynn v. EagleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Varrick v. HittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital ManagersMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API