Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Central Torpedo Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 1926No. 16435PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, 0.

This action was instituted in the district court of Creek county by the xilaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs, against the defendant in error, as defendant, to recover certain sums of money as damages. Upon the trial of the case, the defendant interposed an objection to the introduction of evidence on the part of the plaintiffs for the reason—

“That the petition showed on its face the cause of action, if any, is barred by the statute of limitation.”

This objection was sustained by the trial court, and plaintiffs’ petition dismissed. It appears from the allegation of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Mobile Life Insurance v. RandallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Herron v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Howard v. RitchieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Finnell v. SeismicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Colton v. FoulkesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Morriss v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API