Legal Opinion

Gagne v. Bertran

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1954No. L. A. 23098PublishedCited by 235 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*484TRAYNOR, J.

The evidence in this case is in sharp conflict and is considered here in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs had contracted to buy two unimproved lots for $8,500 “subject to ... a fill test to be made at buyer’s expense.” Plaintiff Joseph Billiet telephoned defendant that he had a contract to buy the lots but “would not proceed with the deal unless we had a test made for fill, and I told him if he would like to do it, I would like to have him handle it because he handled my work before, so he said, ‘All right, I will take care of it.’ ” Billiet testified that between…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by235 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003

230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API