Gagne v. Bertran
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*484TRAYNOR, J.
The evidence in this case is in sharp conflict and is considered here in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs had contracted to buy two unimproved lots for $8,500 “subject to ... a fill test to be made at buyer’s expense.” Plaintiff Joseph Billiet telephoned defendant that he had a contract to buy the lots but “would not proceed with the deal unless we had a test made for fill, and I told him if he would like to do it, I would like to have him handle it because he handled my work before, so he said, ‘All right, I will take care of it.’ ” Billiet testified that between…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by235 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.