Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lewelling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1984No. OSB82-8, SC S30014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding the accused is charged with violation of DR 7-104(A)(l) which provides in relevant part:

“ (A) During the course of his representation of a client a lawyer shall not:
“(1) Communicate or cause another to communicate on the subject of the representation with a party he knows to be represented by a lawyer in that matter unless he has the prior consent of the lawyer representing such other party or is authorized by law to do so.”

and with violation of DR 7-105 (A) which provides:

“(A) A lawyer shall not present, participate in presenting, or threaten to present…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McCaffreyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchwabeOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re James H. LewellingOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cronin v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In re KlempOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API