Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1993No. OSB 91-83; SC S39663PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the accused is charged with violating DR 7-104(A)(1) 1 by communicating with a person whom the accused knew to be represented by a lawyer (here, the president of a corporation), during the course of litigation between that corporation and the accused. The accused seeks review of the trial panel’s conclusion that he, as an inactive member of the Oregon State Bar who was representing himself, is subject to the Code of Professional Responsibility and to Supreme Court disciplinary jurisdiction. The accused also seeks review of the trial panel’s finding that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Oregon Business Planning Council v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Emerald PUD v. PP & LOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McCaffreyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Runsvold v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In re KlempOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API