Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Schwabe
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUEIAM.
The accused member of the bar was charged by the Oregon State Bar with misleading Joseph Herink, a layman not represented by an attorney as to his legal rights in a controversy in which Mr. Schwabe represented clients whose interests were adverse to Mr. Herink. We find for Mr. Schwabe on this charge.
The accused was also charged with communicating with Mr. Herink after Mr. Herink had allegedly retained an attorney and with “intermeddling” in this attorney-client relationship.
Bule 11 of the Eules of Professional Conduct was allegedly violated by the accused. It provides:
“A member of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Cronin v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re SnyderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LewellingOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Sequa Corp. v. Lititech, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.