Legal Opinion

Carr v. Carr

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1911No. Civ. No. 753PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of one Michael Carr, deceased, to recover . from the defendants certain moneys which had been, in his lifetime, deposited by said Michael in the defendant bank.

Judgment passed for plaintiff, and the present appeal is by said M. K. Carr from said judgment, supported by a bill of exceptions.

It is first contended that the omission to insert the word “as” after the name of plaintiff, in the title of the action, necessarily makes the action one prosecuted by plaintiff in his individual right and not in his representative…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
  2. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Grey v. . GreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Denigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hellman v. McWilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ScobieOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Drinkhouse v. German Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. American Bible Society v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API