Legal Opinion

Hellman v. McWilliams

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1886No. 11554PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action brought to determine whether the estate of Eli W. Hawkins, deceased, or his minor children, are entitled to certain money in the hands of plaintiff.

The judgment awarded the property to the minor children, from which judgment, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the defendant, W. D. Stephenson, administrator of the estate of Eli W. Hawkins, deceased, appeals.

In September, 1879, there was due to Eli W. Hawkins from the Odd Fellows' Savings Bank the sum of $14,334.73, in evidence of which Hawkins held a pass-book of said bank, issued to him by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hearst v. PujolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Gray v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Tennant v. John Tennant Memorial HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Gaylord v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API