Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Riley
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 1937No. Civ. 10560PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J., pro tem.
This appeal presents a controversy between living depositors asserting conflicting claims as joint tenants named in a bank account in joint tenancy, created under section 15a of the Bank Act. (Stats. 1921, p. 1367.)
The appeal is by the intervener, Minnie Wallace, from a judgment based upon orders sustaining, without leave to amend, demurrers to the intervener’s second amended complaint, which had been interposed by the plaintiff, Harvey E. Wallace, and the defendant, Charlotte M. Riley.
The complaint in intervention alleges that on August 10, 1933, the plaintiff, Harvey E.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Paterson v. ComastriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Propst v. StillmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.