Denigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
July 6, 1886, Ellen Denigan deposited with the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society the sum of seventeen hundred dollars, and received from the bank a pass-book entitled “Ho. 133,369, Frank Denigan or Ellen Denigan in account with the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society.” There is no evidence of the form in which the account was opened upon the hooks of the hank, hut it is assumed that it was opened in the same form in which it was entered upon the pass-book. February 27, 1888, an additional deposit of thirteen hundred dollars was made with the bank and entered upon the passbook. Frank Denigan was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of BolinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Grey v. . GreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- White v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Shuttleworth v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Crocker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Botchford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.