Legal Opinion

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Scobie

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1926No. 19332PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The Court of Appeals, with one judge dissenting, decided in favor of the administrator, on the ground that upon the facts of the record no gift appeared to have been made, and that the deposit of Green’s funds in a savings account to the credit of himself and Mrs. Richardson, the deposit being made payable to either or survivor, was intended to be of a testamentary character, which, as it was not executed with the formality of a will, was invalid. Viewing the transaction as a testamentary disposition, it of course lacks the requisites of a valid will; and viewing it as a gift, it may be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  4. Battles v. Millbury Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. DuMontimerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Estate of Staver v. StaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Thompson v. BottsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Seavey v. Estate of FanningIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wright v. BloomOhio Supreme Court · 1994

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API