Legal Opinion

Rexroth & Rexroth, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1966No. Civ. 553PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Appellant brought this action against respondent surety company to recover the cost of labor and materials furnished in constructing subdivision "streets and roads” at the request of subdivider Schian. The County of Kern agreed with Schian to approve and accept his proposed subdivision map in return for Schian’s agreement to construct streets and roads according to the map, with the proviso that he post a surety bond "as prescribed by law” to guarantee completion of the subdivision.

Applicable "law” prescribing a bond consisted of the Subdivision Map Act as it existed in 1956 (Bus. & Prof.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. R. J. Cardinal Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Morro Palisades Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Watson v. AcedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Calhoun v. DownsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boliver v. Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
  2. Boyd & Lovesee Lumber v. Western Pacific FinancialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Mai Steel Service Inc. v. Blake Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Progress Glass Co. v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Mark Briggs & Associates, Inc. v. Kinestar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API