Mark Briggs & Associates, Inc. v. Kinestar, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, Acting P. J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment against a corporate surety entered pursuant to former Code of Civil Procedure section 1058a (presently Code Civ. Proc., § 996.440). The judgment was the culmination of plaintiff’s efforts to recover damages from defendants for an alleged breach of contract and for services performed. We affirm.
Defendants failed to answer plaintiff’s complaint and on January 21, 1981, a default judgment was entered. On February 6, 1981, plaintiff recorded an abstract of judgment in Sacramento County. On February 10, 1981, defendant Kinestar transferred…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Morgan v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Bulmash v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Fresno Enterprise Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of South San Francisco v. Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- National Technical System v. Commercial Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Landstar Global Logistics, Inc. v. Robinson & Robinson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Aplanalp v. ForteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Nat. Tech. Systems v. Comm'l ContractorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001