Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Downs

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 9679PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the action after an order sustaining demurrers to the amended complaint without leave to amend.

It is alleged in said amended complaint that the defendants, George Downs and Lola Downs, who are husband and wife, were the owners of certain real property described therein and situated in the county of San Diego, and that while such owners they listed said real property with the plaintiff, a duly licensed and commissioned real estate broker, and employed plaintiff to sell said real property for the sum of $10,000, agreeing to pay plaintiff the usual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sherwood & Sherwood v. Gill & LutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Oatman v. NiemeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Johnson v. Holmes Tuttle Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Sterling v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Super 7 Motel Associates v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Ronay Family Limited Partnership v. TweedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API