Legal Opinion

Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1983No. 14062PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

The district court in this products liability action entered summary judgment for respondent Bell & Gossett Company on several grounds. Appellant Oak Grove Investors contends that the district court erred -in its conclusions regarding the statute of limitations, the potential existence of a product defect, and the effect of an intermediary in the distribution chain. We agree with appellant’s contentions, and therefore reverse and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

THE FACTS

Appellant Oak Grove Investors (Oak Grove), a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. General Electric Company v. BushNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McKee v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Biddulph OldsmobileArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Russell v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Moody v. Manny's Auto RepairNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. A.J. Decoster Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Sprague v. Lucky Stores, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API