Legal Opinion

Brutinel v. Nygren

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1916No. Civil No. 1469PublishedCited by 41 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Greenlee. A. G. McAlister, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, J.

Two important doctrines familiar to the law of agency come forward for consideration in this ease: The one has to do with the appointment of an agent and the nature and extent of his authority; the other relates to the doctrine of ratification and agency by estoppel. In order to make this judgment intelligible in principle and in results, we shall first try to ascertain and summarize the ultimate or cardinal facts to be gleaned from the record, without an attempt to give even a moderate proportion of the details. Then we shall discuss and apply the law as we understand it. The court in this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. President, Directors & Co. of Mechanics' Bank v. New-York & New Haven RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Atlee v. FinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Williams v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Ballentine & Boone v. MercerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Carroll v. TuckerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Parker v. Ohio Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Cote v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Phoenix Western Holding Corporation v. GleesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Podol v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1946

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API