Legal Opinion

Clark v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1948No. 34,623PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court entered upon a verdict for plaintiff. The action arises under the federal employers’ liability act. 45 USCA, §§ 51 to 60, inclusive. Defendant’s motions for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict were both denied by the trial court. These denials were assigned as error, together with the court’s refusal to give certain instructions. We have examined the requested instructions, and we consider that they pertain substantially to the assignments of error raised with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Cooper v. HoeglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Colgan v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Knutson v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. State v. BakkenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API