Johnson v. Evanski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying defendants’ alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
Defendants own and operate a small grocery store in a residential section of Minneapolis. 2 In front of the customers’ entrance door is a platform, 23 inches deep by 7 feet wide, located 31 inches above the ground level. This entrance platform is connected with the sidewalk below by a series of four steps of the same width as the platform. The bottom step is a concrete slab 11% inches deep and 3% inches high. The upper three steps are 11% inches deep with risers varying in height from 7% to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Mosheuvel v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Mitchell v. Volkswagenwerk, AGCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.