Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Evanski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 1946No. 34,087PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendants’ alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

Defendants own and operate a small grocery store in a residential section of Minneapolis. 2 In front of the customers’ entrance door is a platform, 23 inches deep by 7 feet wide, located 31 inches above the ground level. This entrance platform is connected with the sidewalk below by a series of four steps of the same width as the platform. The bottom step is a concrete slab 11% inches deep and 3% inches high. The upper three steps are 11% inches deep with risers varying in height from 7% to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Mosheuvel v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Mitchell v. Volkswagenwerk, AGCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API