Legal Opinion

Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 1, 1943No. 296PublishedCited by 716 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The petitioner’s husband and intestate, John Lewis Tiller, was a policeman for the respondent railroad. Among his duties was that of inspecting the seals on cars in railroad yards to make sure that no one had tampered with them. He had held this position for some years, was familiar with the yard, and was aware, in the words of the court below, that respondent’s employees “are instructed that they must watch out for the movement of the trains as no employee watches out for them and no lights are used at night on the head end of back-up movements except when an employee is placed at the back…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by716 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

711 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API