Legal Opinion

State v. Bakken

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 2000No. C5-99-587PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant Robert Dean Bakken claims that the trial court erroneously admitted prior statements as substantive evidence and erred in declining to disclose the victim’s confidential social service records after an in camera review. Appellant also contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.

FACTS

Thirty-five year-old Robert Dean Bakken pleaded not guilty to three counts of criminal sexual conduct. A third-degree count alleged penetration of a victim at least 13 years of age when the actor was more than 24 months older. T.S., the alleged…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In the Welfare of T.N.Y.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. ZuluCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State of Minnesota v. Brian James LiimattaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State of Minnesota v. Filbert Okari OnyoniCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API