Legal Opinion

Colgan v. Raymond

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1966No. 40102PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant contends (1) that damages were given under the influence of passion and prejudice and are excessive; and (2) that the court erred in holding that certain arguments made to the jury by plaintiff’s counsel were not prejudicial.

The action is brought by John Colgan to recover special damages, individually, and general damages for his minor son, Gary Colgan. The record establishes negligence on the part of the defendant, thus it is unnecessary to discuss the facts causing the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Lott v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Russell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. McCormick v. MalechaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Warnie Lee Ivy, Cross-Appellants v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Delaware Olds, Inc. v. DixonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  5. Northwestern State Bank, Osseo v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API