Legal Opinion
Anticancer Inc. v. Xenogen Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 13, 2007No. Civil No. 05-CV-0448-B(AJB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ANTICANCER’S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR FEES AND COSTS
RUDI M. BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff AntiCancer Inc.’s (“AntiCancer”) Fourth Amended Complaint filed on June 18, 2007. (Doc. No. 219.) Defendants moves to dismiss claims one and two of the Fourth Amended Complaint and to be awarded fees and costs for the present Motion.
For the reasons set forth below, the Court (1) GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; (2)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Iqbal v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Refac International, Ltd. And Forward Reference Systems, Ltd. v. Lotus Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kohler v. Islands Restaurants, LPDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Pellerin v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Kohler v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Rosen v. Masterpiece Marketing Group, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Dodson v. Strategic Restaurants Acquisition Co. II, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.