Legal Opinion

Refac International, Ltd. And Forward Reference Systems, Ltd. v. Lotus Development Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 8, 1996No. 95-1350PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Refac International, Ltd. and Forward Reference Systems, Ltd. (“FRS”) appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York holding that FRS’s patent is unenforceable on the ground of inequitable conduct. REFAC Int’l, Ltd. v. Lotus Dev. Corp., 887 F.Supp. 539 (S.D.N.Y.1995). Because the district court did not make clearly erroneous factual findings or abuse its discretion in determining that the inventors, Rene K. Par-do and Remy Landau, engaged in inequitable conduct, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

The patent in suit, U.S. Patent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  3. Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Critikon, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API