Kohler v. Islands Restaurants, LP
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE [DOC. 7]; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 7]; AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS LEAVE TO AMEND.
THOMAS J. WHELAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to strike Defendants’ affirmative defenses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) or, alternatively, for partial summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 56(a). (PI. ’s Mot. [Doc. 7].) Defendants oppose. (Defs.’ Opp’n [Doc. 10].) The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Kohler v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Roe v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Ader v. Simonmed Imaging Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Polk v. Legal Recovery Law OfficesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Harris v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.