Pellerin v. Honeywell International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS
ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaims. (Docket No. 28.) For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaims is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Honeywell International Inc. designs and manufactures foam hearing protection devices (commonly known as “earplugs”). (Countercl. ¶ 10.) In September 2010, Honeywell acquired Defendant Sperian Protection USA, Inc., which was formerly Defendant Howard S. Leight & Associates, Inc. (Compl. ¶ 10;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Imax Corporation v. Cinema Technologies, Inc. Neil JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Joshua David Mellberg LLC v. WillDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- Ahern Rentals, Inc. v. Equipmentshare.com, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Alana Gutierrez v. Kendal Nutricare USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Alpha Capital, LLC v. KhanukovDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.